The courtroom held that in a state of affairs where a party is aware of to whom he needs to refer, however by mistake attaches the mistaken name to that person, the error may be corrected as a matter of construction of the contract. In this case, the entity ‘Climate Change Group Ltd’ was named within the contract, but it was a dormant firm. It was held that neither party had directed its thoughts as to the question of which individual firm within the group should be the contracting entity, and therefore there was a mistake and the contract must be rectified accordingly. Receive our weekly newsletter with the most recent lawsuit news and legal information. Many a authorized recruiter have even left practicing law and have joined legal recruitment full time, as a result of they like talking to their fellow attorneys concerning their careers. As a legal recruiter, … Read More